The article's subtle implication that we are all changing the world but it'll take time for that change to be realized is truly arrogant and delusional.
Thanks for questioning the honesty of the site. Your comment is truly productive and, sadly, at home against all the jaded (and envious) comments here on HN.
There are people that would like Twitter to just be a straight-up, chronological feed of tweets from people that you follow.
I'd love it if the infinite scrolling shit went away and I could look at tweets by last hour, last 12 hours, last 24 hours, etc, and then paginate by day after that.
You act like engineering things that most people like is a bad thing.
You're not going to please everyone. Even people who will like it a month down the line will hate it when you first roll out the change. And we should you have to support (|feature|!) different websites?
I'm being down-voted because I'm arguing for a feature that all-knowing "hackers" on here feel is hampering their user experience. Because they know what's best for every product they use. And everyone uses that product in the exact way they do so the product should be catered to only them.
Not similar at all actually. You're talking about software written over a couple of years (by humans) that is supporting our current biology versus biological processes that have "optimized" us over tens of thousands of years.