We're looking at cause here not 'cure' or treatment.
Regardless schizophrenic individuals probably would do better with being treated with kindness, respect, compassion, and love than with derision and rejection. At least observational that has been my experience.
I'm not sure the distinction is meaningful at a high level. That which can be implemented in hardware can be emulated in software.
It may be significant with respect to a specific implementation. Do you mean to imply that the current crop of LLMs hallucinate only due to some flaw in the hardware they run on?
There is no software at all, it is all hardware. These are mere abstractions because the reality offers some guarantees which allows one to transfer one system onto another as if the underlying system didn't matter. Those guarantees allows one to speak of commonalities between one stuff and another.
In that vein, there is no hardware either. It too is just an abstraction. However, that is not particularly meaningful. We draw lines around those abstractions and are able to compartmentalize them when discussing them.
Once someone's lost touch with reality, maybe not. In the earliest stages? Maybe, yeah:
> McFarlane believes that psychosis can be prevented with a range of surprisingly low-tech interventions, almost all of which are designed to reduce stress in the family of the young person who is starting to show symptoms.
> McFarlane cites research done at UCLA suggesting that certain kinds of family dynamics — families that don't communicate well, or are overly critical — can make things worse for a young person at risk of schizophrenia.
I can believe it. Not smoking is a great way to prevent certain types of lung cancer. However, if you have lung cancer, quitting smoking won't cure it.
This argument is genuinely horrible. Many times we have two “dogs”, same litter, same love and care, and one will be depressed and the other won’t be. Still think it’s just a software issue now hmmm?
Seriously, can you not just comprehend that it’s a complex issue and there is no singular source you can blame? If your kid committed suicide should I levy child abuse charges against you? And where does someone “learn” depression or schizophrenia anyway, especially if their parents are not acting the same way?
I don't think that's a typical opinion of Apple, like, at all.
It's by far the most sustained criticism the company has ever had with many other criticisms stemming from the same fundamental goal of upcharging and future sales
As a Catholic Christian, I believe that the rays of God's truth shine through all religions to varying degrees, while the Church contains the fullness of the truth.
For example, Jews are the elders of our faith and Christianity is a continuation or fulfillment of Judaism. Jews, Muslims, and Christians all worship the God of Abraham and have some common beliefs.
Our Buddhist brothers and sisters say a lot of good things about detaching ourselves from worldly desires.
But at the end of the day, the Christian faith does proclaim Christ as the one and only Savior, while all other gods are false, and all other religions are inaccurate to various degrees. I do firmly believe this, and I believe that the cumulative evidence points in this direction.
"The blog site Dva Mayora said that Russian specialists are working on an alternative to Telegram, but that the Russian army's Main Communications Directorate has 'not shown any real interest' in getting such a system to Russian troops."
Yeah I can't say I'm surprised. Who needs comms when you are not expecting the bullet catchers to live?
I hope it does not. We do not need more space debris in orbit or more risk to the station and crew.
Also if it lands okay then they are more likely to deduce and correct what the issues are for a possible future mission (though at this point I do not know the likelyhood that Starliner will get another chance)
It would only "blow up" on reentry, don’t think there’s much risk of an actual pressure vessel rupture or hypergolic explosion. So no space debris at least, just littering the ocean.
The problematic thrusters are in the service module, which separates and burns up on reentry. So even if it lands OK, they won't learn anything new about the thruster problem by recovering the capsule.
If it were to blow up it would almost certainly be in the atmosphere due to entering at a bad angle or something. This would leave no debris in orbit and would not endanger the station or crew.
I understand your point from a purely aesthetic standpoint.
However the second that a commonly needed setting is required you're going a layer "deeper" (it's not because before it was at the first level) and that aesthetic is broken. I doubt the iPad first crowd is going to really intuit that.
Genuine question. What's the practical difference between duel-booting and running Win-11 in VM?
I understand there's some performance differences, obviously. And VM requires perhaps a bit more setup and understanding.
However, is it reasonable to VM Win-11 to mediate SB concerns AND be able to have access to basic windows software and services since they're used a lot by industry and universities?
i.e. that is I just need access to Onedrive and MS office for the most part.
GPU passthrough should work for a lot of cases. The games that are most likely to have problems are the ones with draconian drm or anti cheat. I avoid those, so protón tends to work for me anyway, so I don’t bother with windows.
This isn’t technically required, but does make things easier (search “single gpu passthrough). However, an integrated gpu for the host + separate gpu for guest for games is also an option and many modern AMD systems come with an integrated gpu.
> A monitor with two inputs or multiple monitors.
That’s not really necessary, you can use a hdmi splitter or just plug the active gpu in (I mean, if you’re dual booting you can only access one system at a time, so shouldn’t be an issue — you can plug an extension cable into your monitor so that and have a dedicated cable for each gpu, that way you don’t need to mess with plugs at the devices — I actually did this for a while to share my monitor with a games console)
Yes, it’s not the simplest thing to set up, but it does avoid the issues down the OP while still allowing gaming.
Personally, I never bothered because everything I want to play works on proton.
It prevents Windows from running under it's own hypervisor, which it does to provide additional security (some configurations allow certain crypt operations to happen "outside" Windows).
It would work great if NVIDIA, AMD and Intel made high end consumer GPU's that could be shared between host and guest. So far we can only share Intel iGPU's - at least on paper, because I haven't managed to make it work.
... Or hack NVIDIA gpu's and potentially brick your 2000$ card...
In a time when cars are increasingly more connected than ever. More sensors and controls. Literally more software in cars today than ever before and they do this?
The remaining legacy, domestic auto manufacturers are just kind of circling the drain. They all have stupid problems and largely seem to have ridden the coat tails of an older generation that vowed to buy American.
Anecdotally, but my Ford F-150 has so many software bugs it’s insane. It’s mechanically reliable, but the software is terrible.
* backup sensor don’t work about 10% of the time
* backup camera won’t engage about 1% of the time
* main screen will boot loop a few times before it fully turns on about 5% of the time
* heated and cooled seats seem to choose random setting when the car is remote started.
* lane centering system will crash if you try to take it through a turn that’s too tight. Have to turn the vehicle off, open the door to fix it.
* my trailer system won’t remember custom made trailers. I don’t really have a use for the system, but annoying none the less.
* auto power folding mirrors often get confused about their state when shutting down or starting the car up. Annoying, but easily fixed.
* my digital instrument panel will occasionally not turn on
* my digital instrument panel will occasional forget all of my custom settings. Different problem than above.
* Not really a bug, but the car has soooooooooo many popup notifications. There will literally be status messages that are overlaid by an almost identical, but different message. Thank you, F-150, I know that I plugged my cooler into the outlet in the bed. Please stop asking me if I want the generator on. The car is running, I want the generator on.
The physical vehicle is rock solid and I’m extremely happy with that. However, I just want to rip out all of the electronics and replace them with the magic that Kia/Hyundai built in their vehicle.
I largely get this impression anytime I step into an American vehicle. It feels like it was designed by a committee of out of touch executives.
If bugs weren’t so prevalent I’d think a squirrel’s been eating your wires haha. That’s a lot. My Honda has a few but I’m happy with it although I think someday it might kill me with these phantom lane corrections.
It’s a 3 year old vehicle. The backup sensor might be a wiring issue, but everything else is pure software issue.
Many of the “won’t turn on” things actually involve the component powering on (like the backlight turns on), but the digital components just don’t work.
Funny, my Chevrolet has most of the same issues and it drives me mad. The most infuriating one is where the infotainment comes on but is unresponsive to all input. You're stuck if you left the radio too loud or on a station you don't like.
One difference is it's also not mechanically too sound, to boot. The rear end needed a complete rebuild at 9k miles. Yes, nine thousand.
Not per Wikipedia[1]:"Through the Troubled Asset Relief Program the US Treasury invested a total $51 billion into the GM bankruptcy. Until December 10, 2013, the U. S. Treasury recovered $39 billion from selling its GM stake. The final direct cost to the Treasury of the GM bailout was $11-12 billion ($10.5 billion for General Motors and $1.5 billion for former GM financing GMAC, now known as Ally)."
Because a business cycle contraction occurred? If GM had been allowed to fail, other companies would have filled the gap in the market, and new businesses would have emerged, most likely generating even greater tax revenue over time. While there may have been some short-term thumb twiddling, the market would have eventually created new jobs elsewhere, jobs that would have been even more productive. There's a great opportunity cost to "saving" millions of unproductive jobs.
Not true at all; both the bondholders, who under the law were supposed to be senior, got screwed over, and certain non-union salaried employee pensions, were severely cut out of pension money by the PBGC.
The sensors and controls are made by companies like Bosch. GM doesn't need any expertise in this stuff, they just buy parts from companies that have it.
Not true. A few exceptional vendors like Bosch excepted, manufacturers are increasingly in-sourcing development away from the tier suppliers. It's a lot of work managing them to get quality outcomes and that system has repeatedly bitten manufacturers hard in the past decade. It also lengthens development timelines significantly and raises the cost of mid-development changes, when they actually need faster, more responsive development practices.
The issue with companies like GM is that while most people recognize what I've just said internally, there's a lot of conflict between traditional management processes/styles/cultures and the changes they need to make to adapt. These kinds of layoffs tend to result from the financial fragility they've built up. When some minor event puts clouds on the financial horizon, management only understands one tool to make changes and that's layoffs/pay cuts.
Cutting 1000 software engineers doesn't necessarily mean they won't be needing the services of 1000 software engineers. They could just be moving to contract out the work instead of having more in-house staff.
Where do persons get their software from? The environment. Observing how their parents/family/etc interact.
I think it's fair to say that communication matters and that communication & experiences will have an affect on peoples perceptions.