Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | hcks's commentslogin

I know!! Also we could have given an IPhone to 500 million of people for the amount!! It’s such a waste to think they’re investing it in the future instead


At this point why not go low-tech and use healing crystals?


Magnets could be the premium tier


Well either volume weighted or randomised then


HFT is still a massive thing in volume weighted (we call them pro-rata) markets, and it's even more toxic for retail as lots of people submit large orders that are unlikely to get filled immediately (which retail doesn't have the $ to do) to secure a bigger share of the pie


Could you please list say the top 5 Nobel worthy achievements of this backlog


You're right, Meta shouldn't invest in a breakthrough technology. They should focus on what really matters: delivering short term value to shareholders


Round of applause for this useless unsubstantiated comment


This outrage talk is ridiculous, you don’t have the morale high ground to judge people, they didn’t break anything, taking VC money isn’t bad, the incident was caused by sore losers looking for drama, etc etc


They very clearly did break something because a lot of people got upset and said they broke something, and then they admitted they broke something.


This is actually an incredibly stupid thing to say which reflects poorly on NASA management


Hackernews when we may be on the path of actual AI "meh I hate this, you know what’s actually really interesting? Manually writing tests for software"


And by nowadays you mean since ChatGPT got released, that is less than 2 years ago (e.g. a consumer preview of a frontier research project). Interesting.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: