Sure, what I meant is that Dafny outsources everything to SAT/SMT. If it doesn't manage to prove things for you, it gets a bit frustrating as there is not much support for manual tactics compared to F*, Coq or Isabelle, which can also leverage SAT/SMT, but have other options.
That’s a false dichotomy. I’ve never felt the need to do the DS&A grind for one of these roles and I would never dream of writing the ungodly inefficient code you just imputed to my peer group.
> Any respectable employer/employee relationship transacts on results rather than time anyway.
No. This may be common in freelance contracts, but is almost never the case in employment contracts, which specify a time-based compensation (usually either per hour or per month).
I believe parent's point was that if ones management is clueless as to how to measure output and compensation/continued employment is unlinked from same... one is probably working for a bad company.
Well, in the current culture, if you get a reputation for firing people three months after hiring them, you'll have an awfully hard time finding people who want to work for you. And you will probably see your best workers leaving to work elsewhere.
But good college math departments teach reverse Polish notation; i.e., Hewlett-Packard over Texas Instruments. It’s demonstrably more advanced / efficient.