If your assertion is correct that Everett truly "broke" Stellar, than they will be worthless and he will have gained nothing. Your logic is contradictory.
You make 0 sense. I'm not sure if you just have trouble following what I wrote or what the issue is.
> If your assertion is correct that Everett truly "broke" Stellar
1) That is not what I said. Much like the person who doesn't understand what "farming" means in context, I'm just going to assume poor comprehension on your part.
2) Even if that is what I said, he gained internet points and attention. That is still technically speaking "gain", at which point...you are still wrong.
So, I think the issue here is:
1) You can't understand what I wrote either due to me or your poor reading comprehension.
2) You don't realize what you said is inherently false, regardless.
---
At this point, I'm mainly just amused by how everyone leaps up to defend a guy who basically stole Stellars and then waited until he was called out to say anything.
I wonder how well that would work at a bank. Care to try it for me?
Sorry, "break [the] mechanisms", of which the system is composed. Also, nice dodge on the other point.
So far your only arguments are that he got "internet cool points" by gaming a broken mechanism, even if Stellar turns out worthless, and... Oh, that looks like it.
