If if all this is true, LLMs would still need to create a repository of such aggregated "summarizations of secondary sources".
LLMs cannot in real time find and read thousands of secondary sources. Especially not if some of these might have already disappeared or are not digitalized.
I can see a future where LLM labs a) donate to Wikipedia and b) contribute to it with agents that suggest edits and review facts.
I think LLM companies will need to donate and contribute to more direct sources are newspapers, journalists, bloggers, coders posting on stack overflow etc and not Wikipedia (which is more of a tertiary source).
LLMs cannot in real time find and read thousands of secondary sources. Especially not if some of these might have already disappeared or are not digitalized.
I can see a future where LLM labs a) donate to Wikipedia and b) contribute to it with agents that suggest edits and review facts.