> "how is cyber bullying real? Like just close your eyes lmao".
I guess I read this with a widely different angle of view.
I read it more like "it's fine to disagree with feedback", or "it's fine not to contribute 'back'", and you shouldn't feel guilty about this, or think people are guilty when they do these things.
I think having those things in mind can help feel better and have better communication.
About bullying, the author actually explicitly says that it's not okay:
> A user has the freedom to grumble about the software, or how some facet of the software means that they are not going to use the software. (Well, freedom within the constraints of the rules of whatever system they are using to document that grumble; if they’re doing so on someone else’s computer, whoever runs that computer has the freedom not to permit that grumble…). And, IMHO, the expectation that they should be free to do so without harassment.
I guess I read this with a widely different angle of view.
I read it more like "it's fine to disagree with feedback", or "it's fine not to contribute 'back'", and you shouldn't feel guilty about this, or think people are guilty when they do these things.
I think having those things in mind can help feel better and have better communication.
About bullying, the author actually explicitly says that it's not okay:
> A user has the freedom to grumble about the software, or how some facet of the software means that they are not going to use the software. (Well, freedom within the constraints of the rules of whatever system they are using to document that grumble; if they’re doing so on someone else’s computer, whoever runs that computer has the freedom not to permit that grumble…). And, IMHO, the expectation that they should be free to do so without harassment.