Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I can speak with confidence that its hanging on by a thread. IBM has bean counted the development and support staff to the point that entire critical sections of the OS have maybe one, two people working on it. Bugs take months or years to be addressed and security flaws sometimes take just as long to get patched. Not to mention features that were new 20 years ago get the IBM red tape and beuracacy treatment and never get implemented, alienating even more customers.


Yeesh. What a weird area to make deep cuts. They spend all that money developing the hardware, successfully, but it needs the software in order to shine.


My conspiracy brain thinks part of the reason for the red hat acquisition was to funnel disgruntled IBM i customers into that while bleeding the platform dry.


Is the profit that low for IBM to do that? It sounds like it's an empty shell eaten by <>.


Profits fine, its just not raking in billions and billions like IBM Z is, so IBM i always gets the scraps.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: