The first part of your comment lacks understanding of how and why the consent rejection has been worded as it has. If you want to comply it is easy. But if a company wants to skirt the regulation it is written such that the regulatory body can still get you for making it harder.
DNT is not relevant as GDPR is not directly a regulation against tracking, and it certainly isn't because of lobbying.
Not only I don't understand it, the top tier European law firm the company hired also didn't understood it. The law ALLOWS companies to skirt around it. I don't know if that's intentional or not.
> If you want to comply it is easy.
That's the entire antithesis of modern law as opposed to monarchy. Law should be codified in as clear rules as possible.
DNT is not relevant as GDPR is not directly a regulation against tracking, and it certainly isn't because of lobbying.