1. Random gui apps have anything at all to do with terminal emulators. Did the terminal emulator on your partner's system display any of the problems you're complaining about?
2. Resolution issues have anything to do with performance testing - those are different.
3. You think you get to demand anything of developers making something in their free time and giving it away. If they don't want to cater to you, they don't have to - there's no contractual, employment, or other obligation. You can choose to be useful and fix it yourself (or pay someone to), until then you are no different than any random ms employee thinking that ffmpeg gives a shit about teams.
1) My remark is not specific to this particular test but more general. The fact he used a relatively high end machine which is not representative of what most people are using. If we are talking about optimization, this is important.
2) yup in this case usability, see comment above.
3) I am not demanding, I am giving my opinion on what should be done to make better software. If some developers prefer to gatekeep, wallow in mediocrity, they are free to do so as much as I am free to use other pieces of software, write my own at my own level of quality and as much as you are free to wipe your ass with my comments in a piece of paper.
1. Random gui apps have anything at all to do with terminal emulators. Did the terminal emulator on your partner's system display any of the problems you're complaining about?
2. Resolution issues have anything to do with performance testing - those are different.
3. You think you get to demand anything of developers making something in their free time and giving it away. If they don't want to cater to you, they don't have to - there's no contractual, employment, or other obligation. You can choose to be useful and fix it yourself (or pay someone to), until then you are no different than any random ms employee thinking that ffmpeg gives a shit about teams.