Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is based on a 2017 script that looks up if their domain names are attached to an Azure Active Directory Tenant.


But also, what does it say about anything?


Microsoft absolutely dominates corporate IT. Their Office 360 delivers to much values at a low cost that the corps suffer from mediocre MS products because it's all there through a single subscription.


Same for the Google options; except the Google options tend to make non-backward compatible changes and often only go 90% of the way to meet the competition in terms of features. Even their spam detection is not where postini had it years ago.


I worked in Google Workspace.

A CIO needs to see significant upside in choosing a non Microsoft solution to take the risk of not going with on-prem /cloud AD.

Very few enterprises, this is an understatement, use Workspace exclusively.

They need Active Directory Domain Services (on-prem AD) regardless and it is their source of truth (typically syncing to Workdpace for users/roles). The tooling and expertise is in AD. Azure AD will always have a better on-prem to cloud story than Workspace (or any competitor). Plus their licensing makes it a no brainer. It’s a very strong moat.


With AD we have SSO integration with a whole universe of mediocre apps, Jira for instance


I need to always give a password in Jira.


Jira, and the whole of Atlassian Cloud services, bundle SSO as a separate service you pay for. It's called Atlassian Access and it costs $4-$2 depending on number of users, so many companies skip it because it easily doubles your Jira/Confluece costs.

sso.tax


Jira’s cheapest license is $7.5, Atlassian Access as its most expensive is $4 a month. It will never double your Jira bill.


Security tax




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: