Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Anyone who has actually fasted knows this is all nonsense. Sure, you can lose muscle mass — that's always true of going into a caloric deficit, which is the only way to lose weight.


Nonsense? I take you've never actually measured body fat percentage during diet periods.

It is true that caloric deficit always causes muscle; the issue is how much one loses.


I don't see anyone here questioning that you lose muscle, but questioning the idea that confining your eating to a narrow window (or a single meal) is bad.

I'm not aware of any evidence to support that. Fasting patterns have been studied, and I'm not aware that any studies on fasting have shown the effect you describe, but I've not followed the research for some years.

In terms of anecdotal evidence, I have regularly measured body fat percentage during diet periods, and I do see steep drops in body fat percentage when I've done intermittent fasting with the vast bulk of my intake coming in a single meal (2k calories plus during one period). As mentioned elsewhere I now prefer 4-5 days of drastic cuts and eating normally a few days a weak, and without confining it to a narrow period, but I also did IF for many months while at my peak of lifting both in a deficit and not, after having previously done slight deficit dieting in the past, and could compare the difference, and I didn't see the slightest hint of the effect you're claiming.


The middle east has significantly lower rates of cancer attributed partially to fasting in Ramadan and throughout the year.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: